<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why did the chicken cross the road?</title>
	<link>http://andygiger.com/blog/2008/01/02/why-did-the-chicken-cross-the-road/</link>
	<description>Art, Science and Communication... and Nature. Life. And Philosophy. Some Bugs, too...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LH</title>
		<link>http://andygiger.com/blog/2008/01/02/why-did-the-chicken-cross-the-road/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>LH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://andygiger.com/blog/2008/01/02/why-did-the-chicken-cross-the-road/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree that confidence in our conclusions should be proportional to the strength of the data. However I think that facts are overrated in the public perception of science - what is more important is the theoretical framework that the facts help to build, and the testable predictions that the theory generates. A robust theory can produce many useful and dependable applications.

These allow us to make the best of what we currently know, despite the limited information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree that confidence in our conclusions should be proportional to the strength of the data. However I think that facts are overrated in the public perception of science - what is more important is the theoretical framework that the facts help to build, and the testable predictions that the theory generates. A robust theory can produce many useful and dependable applications.</p>
<p>These allow us to make the best of what we currently know, despite the limited information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
